Watch the Deep Dive of this post
Federal Procurement Minefields: Navigating the New Era of Expanded Government Audits
The world of government contracts has undergone a significant transformation over the last several months, marked by the ongoing overhaul of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), alongside massive funding shifts. As contractors adjust, a key question is how federal oversight will evolve. The answer is clear: government investigations and audits are expanding into uncharted territory, providing new challenges and risks for even the most seasoned organizations.
This new era moves beyond traditional audit paradigms, such as investigations into defective pricing or bid rigging, into areas of compliance that were previously less scrutinized. Organizations must take proactive steps to assess and bolster their internal compliance structures now.
The Treasury and SBA Spotlight: Small Business Preferences
A major area of expanded focus is on preference-based contracts, particularly those involving small business initiatives.
The U.S. Department of Treasury recently launched a comprehensive audit targeting all preference-based contracts and task orders across its bureaus, totaling approximately $9 billion in contract value. This initiative specifically focuses on potential misuse of the Small Business Administration (SBA) 8(a) Business Development Program, as well as similar programs for small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, veteran-owned businesses, and Mentor-Protégé programs.
A core goal of this effort is to eliminate contractual arrangements that bypass traditional procurement rules. This includes investigating pass-through structures where large companies, posing as subcontractors, perform nearly all the work while the small business prime contractor collects a fee with minimal effort. The 8(a) program regulations contain explicit rules regarding the percentage of work that can be subcontracted to large businesses, making compliance assessment critical now.
Aligning with this heightened scrutiny, the SBA ordered a full-scale audit of the 8(a) program itself. This gargantuan effort will review high-dollar and limited competition 8(a) contracts dating back fifteen years, starting in 2010. The government intends to pursue previously unaddressed actions to recover fraudulently misused funds, which may result in suspension or debarment of involved parties. Furthermore, the Department of the Treasury is imposing greater accountability standards on small businesses by requiring detailed staffing plans and monthly workforce performance reports, likely resulting in higher compliance burdens and costs.
New Frontiers of False Claims Act (FCA) Enforcement
While traditional fraud investigations will continue, agencies are reimagining the scope of investigative focus, frequently using the federal False Claims Act (FCA) as a powerful enforcement mechanism. New (or re-emerged) target areas include cyberfraud, E-Verify compliance, and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) false certifications.
- Cyberfraud: The DOJ’s civil cyber-fraud initiative is robust and continues to leverage the FCA to pursue government contractors for cybersecurity-related fraud. Enforcement is consistent across changes in administration and has even impacted non-traditional contracting entities like universities and research institutions that fail to comply with required cybersecurity standards.
- E-Verify Compliance: Recent FCA settlements highlight the government’s intent to enforce compliance with E-Verify. Notably, these cases often involve alleged E-Verify violations by subcontractors, not just prime contractor employees. This raises critical questions for prime contractors: Is simply relying on a subcontractor’s certification enough? Contractors must implement systems and processes to ensure subcontractor compliance or face costly liability.
- DEI False Certification: Federal contractors with DEI programs face the threat of audit and non-compliance enforcement. The government plans to use the FCA to punish contractors that engage in illegal DEI practices, often under a false certification theory. The DOJ established its “Civil Rights Fraud Initiative” in May 2025 to investigate and pursue claims against federal fund recipients who knowingly violate civil rights laws, specifically targeting issues such as anti-Semitism and divisive DEI policies.
Action Plan: Get Your Compliance Ducks in a Row NOW
With audits potentially arising unexpectedly, the time is now for contractors to take proactive precautionary steps. Failing to prepare can lead to civil and criminal penalties, suspension or debarment, and damaging reputational harm.
1. Internal Review is Paramount: Conduct an internal review or audit of your federal government contracts compliance programs. Focus on key evolving areas such as E-Verify, small business program requirements, cybersecurity, ethics, and DEI. Although the enforcement landscape for federal DEI executive orders is not fully settled, the current administration is clearly intent on combating what it deems illegal DEI activity.
2. Double-Check Core Compliance Policies: Review and update existing compliance policies and procedures for areas subject to enforcement, including E-Verify, cybersecurity compliance, and billing practices. This could involve a compliance audit conducted internally or by outside counsel, or a “refresher” training focused on government contracts compliance.
3. Train Employees: Employees are the first line of defense and often the initial point of inquiry during an investigation. Provide additional training and reminders about appropriate responses during audits and ensure compliance with hotline posting requirements.
4. Scrutinize Certifications: Review contractual requirements broadly and identify non-obvious compliance obligations, especially existing certifications that could lead to FCA liability. This includes claim certifications, SAM representations, mandatory disclosures, and Service Contract Act requirements.
Taking these steps proactively will significantly reduce risk and position your organization for continued success amidst constant change and flux in the federal procurement environment.
Tags: Federal Procurement, Government Audits, SBA 8(a) Program, False Claims Act, E-Verify, Cybersecurity Compliance, DEI, Small Business Contracts, Compliance, Government Contracts, Procurement, United States, marketus