Watch the Deep Dive of this post

Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules: How Buffkin v. Collins Just Made Winning Your VA Appeal Harder

Keywords: VA Disability, Supreme Court, Veterans Appeals, Buffkin v. Collins, Benefit of the Doubt

In a quiet but monumental shift, the Supreme Court of the United States has changed the rules of engagement for veterans seeking disability benefits. The landmark decision in Buffkin v. Collins, handed down in March 2025, fundamentally altered how your evidence is reviewed when you appeal a VA denial.

If you have ever filed a claim, you know about the Veterans Advantage: the long-standing federal law written into 38 CFR that states if the evidence for your claim and against your claim are in approximate balance—essentially a 50/50 tie or a coin flip—the VA is supposed to rule in your favor.

The Supreme Court didn’t eliminate this benefit of the doubt, but they made it a lot harder to use. For the first time in decades, the system designed to give you the benefit of the doubt just shifted that doubt back into the VA’s favor.

The Paramount Shift: Factual, Not Legal

The core of the Buffkin v. Collins decision lies in a technical reclassification that changes everything for the appeal process:

The Supreme Court ruled that the question of whether the evidence is in “approximate balance” is a factual question, not a legal one.

Why does this matter?

The Court’s Hands Are Tied: Before Buffkin, if an issue was legal, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) could perform a de novo review—meaning they could look at the evidence from scratch and make their own judgment. Now, because the weighing of evidence is factual, the CAVC’s hands are tied.
The “Clear Error” Standard: The reviewing court can now only overturn the VA’s decision if they find a clear error. This is a very high bar. It means that unless the VA’s weighing of the evidence is clearly wrong, the decision stands.
VA’s Subjective Judgments Gain Power: The ruling grants greater power to the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA). The VA’s subjective judgments—how they weighed one doctor’s note against another, or how they judged a veteran’s credibility—now carry more weight than ever before. Once the VA has weighed your evidence, that weighing is essentially final unless you can prove a factual mistake.

In simple terms, the benefit of the doubt now benefits the VA’s version of the truth. This makes it significantly harder to challenge the VA when their interpretation leads to a denial, even if the evidence seems evenly balanced.

The New Battlefield: Three Ways to Win Under the New Rules

Veterans need to adapt their strategy immediately. The fight is no longer just in the courtroom; it’s in the documentation and preparation. Here are the three critical steps to protect your claim after Buffkin v. Collins:

1. Make Your Medical Evidence Bulletproof

In the post-Buffkin landscape, vague, incomplete, or missing medical reasoning will lead to a denial. Your evidence must be airtight, leaving no room for misinterpretation.

Use the Legal Threshold: Your medical opinion must use clear, specific language that meets the legal standard for service connection. This means your doctor must use the crucial five-word phrase: “It is at least as likely as not.” If this standard is missing, the VA can dismiss the opinion as speculative.
Provide Solid Rationales: It is not enough to say a condition is connected to service. Your doctor must provide a solid rational explanation, connecting your timeline, symptoms, stressor, treatment history, and linking it directly to your service record. For instance, explaining how repetitive impacts from ruck marches caused micro trauma that led to degenerative changes.

2. Challenge Factual Mistakes Early

Under the new standard, the VA’s factual findings—what they believe to be true on the record—can only be overturned on appeal if they are clearly erroneous. Once the VA decides something is a fact, it becomes almost untouchable on appeal.

Vigilance is Key: You must read every line of your CMP exam or denial letter like a legal contract. If the VA gets something wrong—a wrong date, a twisted summary of your doctor’s note, or an inaccurate statement—you have to correct it immediately.
The Board is Your Last Stop: The Board of Veterans Appeals is the last place where facts can still be challenged effectively. Once the case leaves the board, those facts are locked in. You must submit a written statement (such as VA Form 21-4138) correcting every single error, no matter how small, before your case advances to the appeal courts.

3. Keep Your Own Paper Trail

After Buffkin v. Collins, your personal records are not just supporting your claim—they are defending it. The VA’s summary and their examiner’s opinion now carry more legal weight, and if you don’t have a strong counter-record, their version becomes the official record.

Document Everything: Get a copy of every doctor visit note. Document your symptoms, pain levels, anxiety attacks, and sleep problems in a dated journal. Keep track of how your condition affects your daily life, family, and work.
Create Your Own Archive: Never assume the VA’s record is complete. Collect and maintain your own comprehensive archive of service treatment records, private medical notes, and VA letters.
Write Your Narrative: Write your own detailed narrative—how the condition started, how it progressed, and how it affects your day-to-day life. This first-hand account, which no one can erase or reinterpret, instantly increases your credibility.

Buffkin v. Collins changed the battlefield, but it didn’t take away your weapon. It means the margin for error is smaller, and you can’t afford to let mistakes slide. By focusing on detailed evidence, early fact-checking, and strong personal documentation, you can still fight smart and win your VA appeal.

Tags: VA claims, Veterans Advantage, Supreme Court decision, VA appeals process, service connection, clear error, factual question, Board of Veterans Appeals, medical evidence, disability benefits, marketus